The Yes Bank AT1 bonds Supreme Court case is finally over, and Yes Bank lost. On October 15, 2026, a Bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and Augustine George Masih threw out the appeals filed by Yes Bank, the Reserve Bank of India and the Union of India. That leaves standing the Bombay High Court’s January 20, 2023 order, which had quashed the March 2020 write-down of ₹8,415 crore of Additional Tier-1 (AT-1) bonds. “We see no reason to interfere with the impugned judgment. The appeals are dismissed,” the court said in its judgment (2026 INSC 1132), a ruling also covered by Bar & Bench and Business Standard.
In this article
Yes Bank AT1 bonds Supreme Court ruling: the core of the judgment
Two series were involved. One was ₹3,000 crore, issued on December 23, 2016; the other was ₹5,415 crore, issued on October 18, 2017. Axis Trustee Services was the trustee for both. The Centre notified the final Yes Bank Limited Reconstruction Scheme, 2020 on March 13, 2020, and the RBI-appointed administrator wrote the bonds down a day later, on March 14.
Here is the catch. The draft scheme did have a clause permitting the write-down. The final scheme did not. The Supreme Court said the administrator acted under a “mistaken belief” that the power still existed, and called the write-down “an impermissible act and ultra vires the Master Circular read with the Reconstruction Scheme”. It also vacated any interim order and said annual coupon payments must be made as per the bonds’ information memoranda.
The regulator didn’t escape criticism either. The court described the RBI as “a mere bystander” while Yes Bank’s CET1 ratio slid to 0.6%.
The numbers that matter: stock, capital, funds
- Share price: Yes Bank ended 14.53% lower at ₹18.12 on the NSE on October 15, its steepest single-day drop since July 2020, according to CNBC-TV18. Business Standard had the close at ₹18.15 (down 14.43%), after the stock fell nearly 16% intraday.
- Coupons: the 2016 series paid 9.5% and the 2017 series 9%, as per Business Standard’s analysis.
- Capital hit (Anand Rathi estimates): putting back just the ₹8,415 crore principal would shrink net worth by 16%, from ₹52,338 crore to ₹43,923 crore, and pull CET-1 down by roughly 250 basis points, from 14% to 11.5%. Add around ₹5,090 crore of coupon arrears (simple interest from March 14, 2020) and the bill rises to about ₹13,500 crore. That would cut net worth by 26% to ₹38,833 crore and take CET-1 to 10%.
- Crisil view: a full write-back could shave about 230–250 basis points off CET-1, while Tier-1 and total capital ratios stay where they are.
- Mutual funds: Kotak AMC stopped fresh subscriptions in Kotak Medium Term Fund and Kotak Credit Risk Fund. Both carry the bonds at zero, so they could see a NAV bump.
Yes Bank’s reply to NSE
NSE sought an explanation for the price move. In its October 15 reply to NSE, the bank confirmed the matter relates to the write-down of ₹8,415 crore of AT-1 bonds. It said it is “obtaining and examining the final order copy of the judgment” and will make further disclosures as needed. What it hasn’t said yet is how bondholders will be paid, or over what timeline.
Who gains, who pays
Bondholders get back a claim that has been worth nothing for over six years. Shareholders are the ones who pay. Anand Rathi reckons the principal alone works out to about 2.4 times FY26 profit after tax, and about 3.9 times once arrears are added, which is why we think a fresh capital raise is a real possibility. For the wider AT-1 market, the message is simple: any write-down has to follow the reconstruction scheme, the RBI Master Circular and the bond terms.
The next thing to watch is Yes Bank’s September-quarter results call on Saturday, October 17, 2026 at 3 PM IST, as per the bank’s exchange intimation. Our Yes Bank Q2 results date note has the details, along with our guide on how to analyse quarterly results and the daily stock market today India hub.

Leave a Reply
Join the conversation
Commenting is open to registered readers. Sign up with just your email — no password needed, and it takes under a minute.
Sign up to comment Log in